Could a decades-old abuse claim strike your ministry?
5 min read

State Case
Local Implications
Doe 254 v. Diocese of Winona
A Minnesota jury just handed down a multi-million-dollar verdict for abuse that happened over 50 years ago—proof that decades-old allegations can still deliver devastating consequences. For churches and ministries, this is a wake-up call. Staying vigilant about historical records and current child protection safeguards isn’t optional; it’s essential for the future of your ministry.
What You Need to Know
In Doe 254 v. Diocese of Winona, an anonymous plaintiff claimed two priests abused him in the 1970s while he attended parochial school. Normally, such an old case would be barred by Minnesota’s statute of limitations—but the 2013 Child Victims Act changed everything. Its three-year “look-back” window reopened the door for survivors to sue, no matter how long ago the abuse occurred.
At trial, the plaintiff argued the ministry’s failure to protect children caused lifelong harm. The jury agreed—awarding $7.6 million for emotional distress, trauma-related health issues, and ongoing care.
What Your Ministry Can Do
Implement Comprehensive Risk Policies: Establish and enforce policies that address safety, supervision, and accountability across all ministry operations. This includes screening personnel and preparing for emergencies.
Maintain Oversight and Safety Protocols: Ensure regular supervision of staff and volunteers, especially in high-risk environments. Conduct routine safety checks on vehicles, facilities, and equipment to prevent accidents and demonstrate proactive care.
Preserve Historical and Operational Records: Retain documentation such as past insurance policies, incident reports, maintenance logs, and leadership decisions.
Why This Matters
The outcome of this case is a textbook example of a nuclear verdict—an extraordinarily large jury award that far exceeds norms and can devastate an organization financially. These verdicts often arise in cases involving child sexual abuse, where juries respond strongly to perceived institutional failure. For ministries, the takeaway is clear: Protecting children isn’t just ethical—it’s essential risk management. Because even historic allegations can trigger explosive consequences. Churches, schools, and related organizations in all states must recognize the imperative of maintaining a safe environment for the minors in their care and respond accordingly.
However, nuclear verdicts aren’t confined to sexual abuse cases. They can arise in any situation where a jury perceives deep emotional trauma, gross negligence, or a lack of accountability. Ministries may face massive exposure in cases involving serious physical injuries, mental health crises, or even reputational harm stemming from leadership failures. The common thread is this: when juries believe an organization failed to protect or care for vulnerable individuals, the financial and reputational fallout can be substantial.
Court: Olmsted County District Court
Status: In June 2025, a jury awarded $7.6 million to Doe 254; the diocese plans to make payment through its bankruptcy trust.
Date: June 30, 2025
Posted September 2025.
While the information provided in this resource is intended to be helpful, it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your area. Please note that no attorney/client relationship is established through this process, and no legal advice will be provided. We strongly recommend regular consultations with a licensed local attorney as part of your risk management program.