Federal Case
Regional Implications
CompassCare v. Hochul
What happens when a ministry is told it must employ individuals whose personal choices are not aligned with its mission? This is the issue CompassCare, a pro-life organization in New York, is facing under New York Labor Law Section 203-e, which prohibits employers from making hiring or firing decisions based on reproductive health choices.
What You Need to Know
In CompassCare v. Hochul, CompassCare contends that the law undermines their ability to require employees to adhere to their religious beliefs, claiming it imposes unconstitutional restrictions on religious organizations’ hiring practices. Meanwhile, New York defends the law as necessary to protect employees from discrimination, arguing that the measure ensures equal employment opportunities without unduly burdening religious freedoms. While a lower court initially dismissed most claims, the Second Circuit reinstated a key claim, indicating the law may violate constitutional protections. The case now returns to the lower court for further proceedings.
What Your Ministry Can Do
Review Governing Documents: Ensure your mission, statement of faith, and employee handbooks clearly define expectations for staff.
Partner with Legal Experts: Seek guidance on crafting policies that balance your convictions with compliance.
Stay Informed: Monitor this and similar cases to anticipate changes that could impact your hiring practices.
