Can ministries be held liable for poorly-planned employee safety drills?
Originally reported in Law & Ministry Update (Vol 4 - November 2025) - case reviewed by the Legal Assist team.
4 min read
State Case
Local Implications
Lopez v. Catholic Charities
A recent Nebraska Supreme Court case reminds ministry leaders that even the best safety plans can backfire if not carried out with care. What began as an active shooter training drill at a Catholic Charities office ended in real injury, trauma, and a court case that reached the state’s highest bench.
What You Need to Know
Sandra Lopez, an employee of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Omaha, experienced a surprise active shooter drill at her workplace in 2022. With no warning that the event was a simulation, Lopez heard pounding on doors, was told a shooter was in the building, and saw what appeared to be a coworker lying dead outside. Terrified, she fled the building and jumped from a retaining wall, injuring her back. She later sued Catholic Charities for assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress, arguing that leaders had deliberately caused fear and injury.
The lower court dismissed Lopez’s case, ruling that, having been injured on the job, her only option was to file for workers’ compensation. Lopez appealed, claiming that since her employer intentionally caused the fear and injury, she should be allowed to sue. The Nebraska Supreme Court disagreed, finding that workplace injuries are still covered by workers’ compensation—even when the employer’s actions were deliberate.
What Your Ministry Can Do
Announce Drills in Advance: Always give clear, advance notice that an event is a drill and not a real emergency to reduce panic and the risk of trauma or injury.
Consult with Experts: Consult with local law enforcement or a safety professional to design realistic, yet trauma-informed training scenarios that avoid graphic staging that can trigger severe reactions.
Provide Post-Drill Support: Conduct an immediate debriefing session and consider offering resources for mental health support following any emergency preparedness exercise to address potential emotional distress.
Why This Matters
This decision serves as both reassurance and warning for ministries. While it limits employer exposure to certain lawsuits in Nebraska, it underscores how safety initiatives can unintentionally harm employees if executed poorly. Even well-meaning efforts to protect staff—such as active shooter drills or emergency simulations—can have significant physical and emotional consequences. Courts may regard resulting injuries as grounds for workers’ compensation claims, rather than civil suits. Still, surprise drills can damage morale, trust, and the well-being of those who serve. Safety exercises should always be designed and communicated in a responsible manner.
Court: Supreme Court of Nebraska
Status: The Nebraska Supreme Court’s decision is final. The ruling affirmed the dismissal of the lawsuit, and no further appeals are pending.
Date: July 29, 2025
Posted November 2025.
While the information provided in this resource is intended to be helpful, it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your area. Please note that no attorney/client relationship is established through this process, and no legal advice will be provided. We strongly recommend regular consultations with a licensed local attorney as part of your risk management program.